Understanding the three challenges of environmental philosophy

challenges of environmental philosophy

There are various branches in philosophy, which are crucial for our well-being. One such branch is the Environmental philosophy. This branch deals with humans place and the natural environment. In the efforts of conserving the environment, the challenges that we face such as global warming, climate changes, pollution, environmental degradation etc all contribute in making the right move for the well being of our environment.

Driving factors for environmental philosophers


In order for environmental philosophers to come up with the right ways to overcome the various challenges in environmental wellbeing, there are certain factors or areas that play a vital role by helping in planning and developing the right strategies. These areas of interest include:

  • Nature and environment definition
  • Valuing the environment in the right way
  • Understanding the moral status of plans and animals
  • Getting to know the present statics and numbers of the various species in the world and understanding the ones that are in danger of extinction
  • Deep Ecology and Environmentalism
  • Value of nature aesthetically and restoring it
  • Keeping in mind the future generation and moving accordingly

The three main challenges that we need to look into

Overcoming Anthropocentrism is the first challenge

It is important for people to respect nature not because we stand to gain from it, but also because it is our moral duty.  To overcome Anthropocentrism, the intrinsic value concept helps in defending the various things of nature that we should respect. For humans to survive, it is essential that our natural resources and surroundings should be preserved. By adopting a holistic human centered value system that focus on our moral responsibilities and duties, we can easily overcome Anthropocentrism and care for the environment in the right way.

The next challenge us understanding where we stand

nature lovers

The assumptions and misconceptions that humans have is that they have the supreme rights over the environment. What we tend to forget is that there are other life forms that equally deserve to share the natural resources and offerings of the environment. The one benefit that humans have is that they can make a positive change and difference on the environment. Unfortunately, because we forget our place in nature, we are actually causing more damage than helping out/ if we place ourselves on the top of the chain and claim that, we have the ability to rule, it also means that we have to ensure that we work towards the wellbeing of every life form. Just like how the people of a country need a leader to help protect them, similarly, every life form on earth needs somebody to protect them. If we understand our place then it will change our thought process in a better way.  By taking the right advice and helping in this front, we can take the help to come up with the right direction and text on where we stand. This is something that experts like or environmental philosophers can do.

Moral status definition is the third challenge

Moral status is not just restricted to humans, but it is also applicable to animals as well. Although there are various movements for the well-being of animals, the problem is that not all of them are on the same page. What makes it worse is that the goals of environmentalists and the goals of animal welfare activists are also different. The definition of moral status is necessary in order to overcome the challenges that are presently faced by many. It is not in our hands to decide who deserves the right to live and who does not.

Article Submitted By Community Writer

Today's Top Articles:

Scroll to Top